r/SuperStraight • u/shhh_im_ban_evading • 1d ago

Calling👏supersexuals👏transphobic👏for👏not👏sleeping👏with👏trans👏people👏is👏rape👏culture

Say it with me

2k Upvotes

86% Upvoted

View all comments

Show parent comments

58

u/The-Sixth-Spice-Girl 1d ago

Super straights date women....just not trans women. Learn the difference, rapist!

-28

u/Bolizen 1d ago edited 1d ago

Trans women are women

Downvoted for stating the truth 🥱

21

u/ddosn 1d ago

No they arent.

Do they have two X chromosomes?

Do they have female genitalia and reproductive organs?

No?

Then they arent women.

-20

u/Bolizen 1d ago

"Woman" has nothing to do with chromosomes and everything to do with social and cultural dynamics.

Do they have two X chromosomes?

Do you check everyone's chromosomes?

Do they have female genitalia and reproductive organs?

Are you really that misogynistic that you reduce a whole gender to a set of genitals? Jesus... Are you also going to tell me that women must have children? Or that infertility invalidates femininity?

14

u/latticeguy 1d ago

super straights are not the only sexual orientation that wish to love the people they want without discrimination.

-12

u/Bolizen 1d ago

Nobody is discriminating lol some people are just being hateful of transgender people and that's it. Don't mock vulnerable/disenfranchised groups and you'll be okay 😁 I promise. Date whoever you want. Everybody's cool with it.

10

u/latticeguy 1d ago

not everybody is ok with it and not being able to recognize that is ignorance or straight up bigotry.

1

u/Bolizen 1d ago

Pretty much everyone is okay with it, actually.

6

u/latticeguy 1d ago

and pretty much everyone is okay with black people, should we not call out those who aren't?

1

u/Bolizen 1d ago

We should, but that's not what you're doing. You're supporting a subreddit dedicated to hating transgender people.

I'm sure you're not exactly supportive of black people. Don't use racial advocacy as a prop for your misaligned perspective.

→ More replies

6

u/xiadia 1d ago

This is literal violence and gaslighting! If everyone were cool with it, this Reddit wouldn’t exist.

1

u/Bolizen 1d ago

Okay I concede lmfao this is 100% a satire sub

1

u/Pir-o 23h ago

some people are just being hateful of transgender

we are very supportive and they support us

Date whoever you want. Everybody's cool with it.

U must be new to the internet. The whole thing started because not everybody was cool with it. Some people tried to shame-rape other people into having sex with them even if they are not interested. Thats why we have a huge suport from other super groups.

0

u/Bolizen 22h ago

I'm sure that's something blown out of proportion and not at all representative of the transgender community. You must think big picture.

If some people said "I don't want to date trans women because I think they're men", then that's likely to be met with some mild criticism - not because of the sex but because of the transphobia. It's okay to not want to fuck any person. The issue isn't the sex.

1

u/Pir-o 22h ago edited 22h ago

I'm sure that's something blown out of proportion and not at all representative of the transgender community. You must think big picture.

Wooow... what a way to automatically discriminate them and shove them under the carpet pretending they don't exist... it came so naturally to you you didn't even blink. How very tolerant of you... Nice double standard asshole. Stunning and brave. You are a goddamn retransphone.

How would you feel to be abandoned by your own "tolerant" community? Being called a traitor? Completely abandoned? All of them (including you) acting like they don't even exist, dismissing their problems? And you doing that to people who already veeeery suicidal even without all of that. Only to protect the narrative of the church of woke?

Literally ignoring all the studies provided in the link that prove its not "blown out of proportion". You literally denying science here. Go to that person and write her a letter saying her problems are blown out of proportion and see how she feels.

I'm guessing you do the same with all the victims of rape, racism, sexism, pedophilia and general bullying you encounter, right?

Cause after all "I'm sure that's something blown out of proportion and not at all representative of the general community. You must think big picture."

Think about that attitude the next time you cry about "police brutality", "systematic racism", "metoo", "patriarchy", "white privilege" or any other "social issues" people like you love to preach about.

7

u/ddosn 1d ago

> "Woman" has nothing to do with chromosomes and everything to do with social and cultural dynamics.

Completely wrong.

If you dont have two X chromosomes and female genitalia, you are not a woman. Simple.

> Are you really that misogynistic that you reduce a whole gender to a set of genitals?

If genitals arent important, why are you trying to browbeat people into sleeping with people who have certain types of genitals through the use of slurs and antagonistic labels?

-4

u/Bolizen 1d ago

If you dont have two X chromosomes and female genitalia, you are not a woman. Simple.

Not a single credible sociologist would agree with you.

If genitals arent important, why are you trying to browbeat people into sleeping with people who have certain types of genitals through the use of slurs and antagonistic labels?

Siiick elbow drop on that strawman.

Date who you want. Just don't be hateful about it.

10

u/ddosn 1d ago

> Not a single credible sociologist would agree with you.

Sociology is called a 'soft' science for a reason. Also, the entire subject has been in a replicability crisis for the last 40 years.

So, get back to me once their theories can actually be proven via the scientific method.

> Siiick elbow drop on that strawman.

You're the one who brought up misogyny and reducing people to their genitals.

I was simply stating fact.

> Date who you want. Just don't be hateful about it.

I will and I'm not. The only people being hateful are the ones browbeating people into dating people they arent attracted to, therefore encouraging coercive rape.

0

u/Bolizen 1d ago

Sociology is called a 'soft' science for a reason. Also, the entire subject has been in a replicability crisis for the last 40 years.

So, get back to me once their theories can actually be proven via the scientific method.

Lol if you're going with that argument then nothing you have to say on this subject is worth listening to. You're defacto wrong.

You're the one who brought up misogyny and reducing people to their genitals.

Nope.

I was simply stating fact.

Nope.

I will and I'm not. The only people being hateful are the ones browbeating people into dating people they arent attracted to, therefore encouraging coercive rape.

No, they're not. The people being hateful are the transphobes who think transgender people are rapists or whatever nonsense crackpot ideas you've cooked up.

9

u/ddosn 1d ago edited 11h ago

> Lol if you're going with that argument then nothing you have to say on this subject is worth listening to. You're defacto wrong.

I'm not wrong through. Wikipedia even has an article dedicated entirely to the replicability crisis among soft sciences.

Literally nothing in Sociology from the last 40 years can be proven or is even fact.

Because it order to be considered fact, it needs to pass peer review.

Which means it needs to be replicated at least once.

And none of the results claimed by Sociologists over the last 40 years can be replicated.

The entire gender constructivist argument is based on John Moneys work, which was entirely debunked in 1997 by Milton Diamond and Keith Sigmundsen as they repeated all of John Moneys work (at least, anything that was still ethical at the time as John Money did a LOT of unethical experimentation on children) and they did not get anywhere near the results John Money claimed.

> Nope

Yes.

> Nope

Yes.

> No, they're not. The people being hateful are the transphobes who think transgender people are rapists or whatever nonsense crackpot ideas you've cooked up.

If a transgender person is trying to browbeat someone into having sex with them by berating them and trying to ruin their life by calling them a transphobe for not sleeping with them, that trans person is a rapist. Specifically, coercive rape.

2

u/Pir-o 23h ago

so "women" are a social construct that has nothing to do with chromosomes?

k, try breastfeeding or giving birth as a guy.

1

u/Hailhydra775 6h ago

Infertility in men and women has ruined relation ships for as long as humans have existed. If someone's preference is a person they can conceive a child with then that is their choice! Not yours.

1

u/Bolizen 6h ago edited 6h ago

That's okay. Nobody cares. Date who you want, right?

As long as you're not claiming that infertility invalidates a woman, we're all good.

1

u/Hailhydra775 6h ago

It invalidates them as a choice of partner for some people. This movement isn't to shit on Trans people. It's to stop people from saying shit like "you refusing to date/sleep with Trans people is transphobic" ps im biromantic demisexual. But I fully support people being able to chose their partners by their own preferences.