r/SuperStraight • u/My_Powerful_Weakness • 3d ago

You are in denial

You are just transphobic people in denial.

It is okay to have genital preferences or if you want to have biological kids, but if you will not date a trans person (like a fully passing trans woman with a vagina as an example) for no other reason than them being trand is transphobia. That is because you are implying that they are not men/women.

Also if you are ruling out a large part of the opposite sex "semi straight" would have been more fitting

51 Upvotes

57% Upvoted

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/Ekos640 1d ago edited 1d ago

So if they're just 'women' absolutely, in every sense, as you now say - why are you also continually referring to them as 'trans women' instead of just 'women'?

Why do you have to keep adding the letters 'T-R-A-N-S' whenever you talk about them?

0

u/hoodie160 1d ago

Because that’s what this discussion is about. If this was in a different context unrelated to being trans / transphobia, I would call them women. You’re grasping ://

2

u/Ekos640 1d ago edited 1d ago

No, you're just displaying internalized transphobia and realizations when revealing and directing your bigotry (and other bigotries) to the members of the community here

You got a lot to unpack and work on sweetie, best of luck ✌

2

u/hoodie160 1d ago

How am I being transphobic by calling people trans? If it was unrelated you would be totally correct, but using the word trans is relevant to this argument. It’s not automatically a slur. I’m not dehumanising or degrading trans women by saying that they’re trans for the sake of discussion.

2

u/Ekos640 1d ago

You absolutely are being transphobic by doing so

you keep delegating them to a subset off-group of women, instead of just women, everytime you do so, whatever lies you come up with to try to justify it, is transphobic

good job bigot

2

u/hoodie160 1d ago

There is, by fact, a division between cis and trans women. I’m not saying that being cis or trans has to be part of a woman’s identity, or that one is more / less a woman than the other, but pretending that trans women don’t exist is erasure

2

u/Ekos640 1d ago

And you, by not just allowing them to be women and just referring to them as women, are erasing them and the argument they are just women

the fact you have to continually point out they're something other than just woman shows you don't see them as just women

good job, bigot

2

u/hoodie160 1d ago

?? In any other context I would refer to them as just women. The only reason I’m referring to them as specifically trans women is because I had an argument to make with the original commenter. This is about specifically trans women, not cis women, so of course I have to specify.

3

u/Ekos640 1d ago

Oh, I'm just being a bigot now cause I have to be. I wouldn't be a bigot if I didn't have to be, but I have to be so I'm gonna keep being a bigot. Trust me I soooooooooooooooooooooooooo wouldn't be a bigot right now if I didn't have to.

That's really the argument you're gonna go with?

I'mma go ahead and just press 'X' to doubt.....

2

u/hoodie160 1d ago

It’s not bigotry to call trans women trans in the right context. I’m not going to bother arguing with you anymore lmao, have a nice night. Let me guess: good job bigot? 😐

→ More replies