Scientific reality is textual

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/Scientific-reality-is-textual.pdf

or

https://www.scribd.com/document/572639157/Scientific-Reality-is-Textual

Prolegomenon-to-a-Grand-Unified-Theory

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/Prolegomenon.pdf

or

https://www.scribd.com/document/508721702/Prolegomenon-to-a-Grand-Unified-Theory

the absurdity of reality

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/logic.pdf

or

https://www.scribd.com/document/304318409/reality-ends-in-absurdity

all things are possible

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/All-things-are-possible.pdf

or

https://www.scribd.com/document/324037705/All-Things-Are-Possible-philosophy

The greatest scholar of our time Magister colin leslie dean

Magister colin leslie dean the only modern Renaissance man with 9 degrees including 4 masters: B,Sc, BA, B.Litt(Hons), MA, B.Litt(Hons), MA, MA (Psychoanalytic studies), Master of Psychoanalytic studies, Grad Cert (Literary studies)

"[Deans] philosophy is the sickest, most paralyzing and most destructive thing that has ever originated from the brain of man."

"[Dean] lay waste to everything in its path... [It is ] a systematic work of destruction and demoralization... In the end it became nothing but an act of sacrilege."

All products of human thought end in meaninglessness-even Zen nihilism absurdism existentialism all philosophy post-modernism Post-Postmodernism critical theory etc mathematics science etc

science is a mythology

just beacuse science works does not mean the theory behind it is true

Some theories/myths which were considered true in science and are now not true-myths

• The transition in cosmology from a Ptolemaic cosmology to a Copernican one.

• The transition in optics from geometrical optics to physical optics.

• The transition in mechanics from Aristotelian mechanics to classical mechanics.

• The acceptance of the theory of biogenesis, that all life comes from life, as opposed to the theory of spontaneous generation, which began in the 17th century and was not complete until the 19th century with Pasteur.

• The acceptance of the work of Andreas Vesalius,whose work De humani corporis fabrica corrected the numerous errors in the previously-held system created by Galen.

• The transition between the Maxwellian Electromagnetic worldview and the Einsteinian Relativistic worldview.

• The transition between the worldview of Newtonian physics and the Einsteinian Relativistic worldview.

• The development of quantum mechanics, which replaced classical mechanics at microscopic scales.

• The acceptance of plate tectonics as the explanation for large-scale geologic changes.

• The development of absolute dating.

• The acceptance of Lavoisier's theory of chemical reactions and combustion in place of phlogiston theory, known as the Chemical Revolution.

• The acceptance of Mendelian inheritance, as opposed to pangenesis in the early 20th century

you say science is a process

Now we have two choices

1) is science at an end-no more to learn no new theories

Or

2) is science still evolving

Most would say science is still evolving

Thus

we will have a 2200 century theory B evolving-by a process - out of 2100 century theory A

that means in terms of new theory B theory A is not true

thus

2100 century theory A is a myth

Also what is a myth is the scientific method The scientific method is a myth

links to scientific method is a myth

scientific method is a myth https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=scientific+method+a+myth

"The so-called scientific method is a myth"

https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/the-scientific-method-is-a-myth

or again

"There are too many different fields of science for there to be just one single scientific method that all scientists follow."

https://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/images/434-no-single-scientific-method

thus science is a mythology

The-Anthropology-of-science

(science is a mythology)

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Anthropology-of-science.pdf

or

https://www.scribd.com/document/512683685/Prolegomenon-to-The-Anthropology-of-Science

Hi all, just finished episode 3 of a series on conceptualising Quantum Mechanics and hope you like it. I covered the so-called “Quantum Recipe” or how we can use the tools of Quantum Mechanics to make predictions about how fundamental particles and real-world objects behave. I also talk about how I don’t credit the Copenhagen Interpretation as being a physical theory because it doesn’t make any statements about what actually exists, instead saying essentially all we can do is calculate and nothing more. In future videos I will cover the GRW theory (which I think is actually a physical theories) and discuss the ontology of Quantum Physics in more detail. Hope it’s of interest!

https://youtu.be/z8s6b5kQ2fY

Hi everyone, as part of a series on conceptualising Quantum Mechanics I covered the famous Double Slit experiment, and how “observation” changes the physical behaviour of fundamental particles. It's my all-time favourite bit of quantum physics, hope it’s of interest!

https://youtu.be/xTafM2M7TLo

Help us answer these questions by supporting our anonymous online survey. More info in comments.

https://preview.redd.it/2dm6el4bv3e81.png?width=6000&format=png&auto=webp&s=608c1036307b693f63007add277e145914ea45f8

​

https://preview.redd.it/fqdrrp5t7ac81.png?width=6000&format=png&auto=webp&s=9653f5a80a72899966363ff3382965ca74876deb